| 000 | 02623naaaa2200421uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/85305 | ||
| 005 | 20260216164814.0 | ||
| 003 | oapen | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
| 008 | 20220701s2021 xx |||||o ||| 0|fra d | ||
| 020 | _abooks.enseditions.16562 | ||
| 020 | _a9791036202575 | ||
| 020 | _a9791036202551 | ||
| 040 |
_aoapen _coapen |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.4000/books.enseditions.16562 _cdoi |
|
| 041 | 0 | _afra | |
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 072 | 7 |
_aJHB _2bicssc |
|
| 100 | 1 |
_aFrobert, Ludovic _4auth |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aVers l’égalité, ou au-delà ? _bEssai sur l’aube du socialisme |
| 260 |
_aLyon _bENS Éditions _c2021 |
||
| 300 | _a1 electronic resource (202 p.) | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 490 | 1 | _aGouvernement en question(s) | |
| 506 | 0 |
_aOpen Access _2star _fUnrestricted online access |
|
| 520 | _aHow should socialism articulate the two exigencies which have always defined it: “to each according to his needs” and “to each according to his merits”? This short essay proposes to look back at its origins. In one of his beautiful turns of phrase, Pierre Leroux wrote, “Socialism appears, and the dawn of day is 1830”. Proceeding here from a few portraits, notably those of Louis Blanc and Constantin Pecqueur, François-Vincent Raspail and George Sand, this essay shows how in this period of genesis, which even invented the term “socialism”, the exigency of need was seen as the guiding principle. Far from being denied, merit nevertheless remained associated with this exigency. Already in those times of the first liberal waves, this original articulation allowed socialism to identify itself first, then to resist and finally to create, both in the field of ideas and that of experimentation, new paths to emancipation and social, economic and political progress. This option consisting in resolutely placing the wager of socialism beyond mere equality of opportunity, however rigorously defined it may be, therefore deserves to be recalled and reconsidered today. | ||
| 540 |
_aAll rights reserved _4http://oapen.org/content/about-rights |
||
| 546 | _aFrench | ||
| 650 | 7 |
_aSociology _2bicssc |
|
| 653 | _asocialism | ||
| 653 | _autopia | ||
| 653 | _a1830-1848 | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_awww.oapen.org _uhttps://books.openedition.org/enseditions/16562 _70 _zDOAB: download the publication |
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_awww.oapen.org _uhttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/85305 _70 _zDOAB: description of the publication |
| 999 |
_c50 _d50 |
||